Dataset Information

Optimal dosing of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime for critically ill paediatric patients. Can we use microsampling?

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To describe the population pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime in critically ill paediatric patients and provide dosing recommendations. We also sought to evaluate the use of capillary microsampling to facilitate data-rich blood sampling.

Methods

Patients were recruited into a pharmacokinetic study, with cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime concentrations from plasma samples collected at 0, 0.5, 2, 4 and 6 h used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model using Pmetrics. Monte Carlo dosing simulations were tested using a range of estimated glomerular filtration rates (60, 100, 170 and 200 mL/min/1.73 m2) and body weights (4, 10, 15, 20 and 40 kg) to achieve pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets, including 100% ƒT>MIC with an MIC breakpoint of 1 mg/L.

Results

Thirty-six patients (0.2-12 years) provided 160 conventional samples for inclusion in the model. The pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime were best described using one-compartmental model with first-order elimination. The clearance and volume of distribution for cefotaxime were 12.8 L/h and 39.4 L, respectively. The clearance for desacetylcefotaxime was 10.5 L/h. Standard dosing of 50 mg/kg q6h was only able to achieve the PK/PD target of 100% ƒT>MIC in patients >10 kg and with impaired renal function or patients of 40 kg with normal renal function.

Conclusions

Dosing recommendations support the use of extended or continuous infusion to achieve cefotaxime exposure suitable for bacterial killing in critically ill paediatric patients, including those with severe or deep-seated infection. An external validation of capillary microsampling demonstrated skin-prick sampling can facilitate data-rich pharmacokinetic studies.

SUBMITTER: Guerra Valero YC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9333413 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Optimal dosing of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime for critically ill paediatric patients. Can we use microsampling?

Guerra Valero Yarmarly C YC Dorofaeff Tavey T Coulthard Mark G MG Sparkes Louise L Lipman Jeffrey J Wallis Steven C SC Roberts Jason A JA Parker Suzanne L SL

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 20220701 8

<h4>Objectives</h4>To describe the population pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime in critically ill paediatric patients and provide dosing recommendations. We also sought to evaluate the use of capillary microsampling to facilitate data-rich blood sampling.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients were recruited into a pharmacokinetic study, with cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime concentrations from plasma samples collected at 0, 0.5, 2, 4 and 6 h used to develop a population pharmacokinetic ...[more]

PMID: 35678266

Similar Datasets

Project description:Fluconazole is frequently used for the treatment of invasive Candida infections in critically ill patients. However, alterations in renal functions might influence fluconazole clearance. Therefore, our objective was to study the impact of renal function on the population pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in critically ill patients with various degrees of renal function or undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). This was an open-label, multicenter observational study. Critically ill patients receiving fluconazole were included. Baseline and clinical data were collected. At days 3 and 7 of enrollment, blood samples were drawn for pharmacokinetic curves. Additionally, daily trough samples were taken. A nonlinear mixed-effects model was built, followed by Monte Carlo simulations for assessment of exposure to various dosages of fluconazole. Nineteen patients were included with a median age of 64.4 (range, 23 to 81) years and median weight of 82.0 (range, 44.0 to 119.5) kg. A linear two-compartment model best described fluconazole pharmacokinetics and demonstrated higher clearance than expected in critically ill patients. Simulations showed that daily dosages of 600 mg and 800 mg are needed for intensive care unit (ICU) patients with normal renal function and patients on CRRT, respectively, to achieve the EUCAST-recommended target fAUC (area under the concentration-time curve for the free, unbound fraction of the drug)/MIC ratio of 100. In conclusion, fluconazole clearance is highly variable in ICU patients and is strongly dependent on renal function and CRRT. Trough concentrations correlated well with the AUC, opening up opportunities for tailored dosing using therapeutic drug monitoring. We recommend doses of 400 mg for patients with poor to moderate renal function, 600 mg for patients with adequate renal function, and 800 mg for patients treated with CRRT. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02666716.).

Project description:IntroductionThe aim of this study was to determine whether using pharmacodynamic-based dosing of antimicrobials, such as extended/continuous infusions, in critically ill patients is associated with improved outcomes as compared with traditional dosing methods.MethodsWe searched Medline, HealthStar, EMBASE, Cochrane Clinical Trial Registry, and CINAHL from inception to September 2013 without language restrictions for studies comparing the use of extended/continuous infusions with traditional dosing. Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data on methodology and outcomes, and performed quality assessment. Meta-analyses were performed by using random-effects models.ResultsOf 1,319 citations, 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n?=?782 patients) and 13 cohort studies (n?=?2,117 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Compared with traditional non-pharmacodynamic-based dosing, RCTs of continuous/extended infusions significantly reduced clinical failure rates (relative risk (RR) 0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 0.94, P?=?0.02) and intensive care unit length of stay (mean difference, -1.5; 95% CI, -2.8 to -0.2 days, P?=?0.02), but not mortality (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.19; P?=?0.38). No significant between-trial heterogeneity was found for these analyses (I2?=?0). Reduced mortality rates almost achieved statistical significance when the results of all included studies (RCTs and cohort studies) were pooled (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.00; P?=?0.054).ConclusionsPooled results from small RCTs suggest reduced clinical failure rates and intensive care unit length-of-stay when using continuous/extended infusions of antibiotics in critically ill patients. Reduced mortality rates almost achieved statistical significance when the results of RCTs were combined with cohort studies. These results support the conduct of adequately powered RCTs to define better the utility of continuous/extended infusions in the era of antibiotic resistance.

Project description:BackgroundA substantial proportion of critically ill COVID-19 patients develop thromboembolic complications, but it is unclear whether higher doses of thromboprophylaxis are associated with lower mortality rates. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the association between initial dosing strategy of thromboprophylaxis in critically ill COVID-19 patients and the risk of death, thromboembolism, and bleeding.MethodIn this retrospective study, all critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to two intensive care units in March and April 2020 were eligible. Patients were categorized into three groups according to initial daily dose of thromboprophylaxis: low (2500-4500 IU tinzaparin or 2500-5000 IU dalteparin), medium (> 4500 IU but < 175 IU/kilogram, kg, of body weight tinzaparin or > 5000 IU but < 200 IU/kg of body weight dalteparin), and high dose (≥ 175 IU/kg of body weight tinzaparin or ≥ 200 IU/kg of body weight dalteparin). Thromboprophylaxis dosage was based on local standardized recommendations, not on degree of critical illness or risk of thrombosis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals of death within 28 days from ICU admission. Multivariable models were adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, Simplified Acute Physiology Score III, invasive respiratory support, and initial dosing strategy of thromboprophylaxis.ResultsA total of 152 patients were included: 67 received low-, 48 medium-, and 37 high-dose thromboprophylaxis. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. For patients who received high-dose prophylaxis, mortality was lower (13.5%) compared to those who received medium dose (25.0%) or low dose (38.8%), p = 0.02. The hazard ratio of death was 0.33 (95% confidence intervals 0.13-0.87) among those who received high dose, and 0.88 (95% confidence intervals 0.43-1.83) among those who received medium dose, as compared to those who received low-dose thromboprophylaxis. There were fewer thromboembolic events in the high (2.7%) vs medium (18.8%) and low-dose thromboprophylaxis (17.9%) groups, p = 0.04.ConclusionsAmong critically ill COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure, high-dose thromboprophylaxis was associated with a lower risk of death and a lower cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events compared with lower doses.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT04412304 June 2, 2020, retrospectively registered.

Dataset Information

Optimal dosing of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime for critically ill paediatric patients. Can we use microsampling?

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Optimal dosing of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime for critically ill paediatric patients. Can we use microsampling?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets