Dataset Information

Effect of a hybrid team-based advanced cardiopulmonary life support simulation program for clinical nurses.

ABSTRACT:

Background

During in-hospital cardiac arrest events, clinical nurses are often the first responders; therefore, nurses require sufficient advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) competency. This study aimed to verify the effects of a hybrid team-based ACLS simulation (HTAS) program (developed in this study) on nurses' ACLS performance, specifically ACLS knowledge, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) self-efficacy, and CPR-related stress.

Methods

The developed HTAS comprised four lecture videos, one team-based skills training video, and a team-based ACLS simulation. A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design with a comparison group (CG) was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the HTAS. Of the 226 general ward nurses with more than 6 months of clinical experience, 117 were allocated to the intervention group (IG), which attended the HTAS, and 109 to the CG, which attended only basic ACLS training.

Results

The IG's ACLS performance significantly improved (t = 50.8, p < 0.001) after the training. Relative to the respective pretest conditions, posttest ACLS knowledge (t = 6.92, p < 0.001) and CPR self-efficacy (t = 6.97, p < 0.001) of the IG also significantly increased. However, when the mean difference values were compared, there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to ACLS knowledge (t = 1.52, p = 0.130), CPR self-efficacy (t = -0.42, p = 0.673), and CPR stress (t = -0.88, p = 0.378).

Conclusion

The HTAS for ward nurses was effective at enhancing the nurses' ACLS performance. It is necessary to develop effective training methods for team-based ACLS and verify the sustained effects of such training.

SUBMITTER: Jeong HW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9757587 | biostudies-literature | 2022

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effect of a hybrid team-based advanced cardiopulmonary life support simulation program for clinical nurses.

Jeong Hye Won HW Ju Deok D Lee Ae Kyong AK Lee Jung A JA Kang Na Ru NR Choi Eun Jeong EJ Ahn Shin Hye SH Moon Sun-Hee SH

PloS one 20221216 12

<h4>Background</h4>During in-hospital cardiac arrest events, clinical nurses are often the first responders; therefore, nurses require sufficient advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) competency. This study aimed to verify the effects of a hybrid team-based ACLS simulation (HTAS) program (developed in this study) on nurses' ACLS performance, specifically ACLS knowledge, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) self-efficacy, and CPR-related stress.<h4>Methods</h4>The developed HTAS comprised four lect ...[more]

PMID: 36525410

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of rescuer team size on objective skill measures of basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) using high-fidelity canine CPR simulation.DesignProspective, experimental study.SettingVeterinary clinical simulation center.SubjectsForty-eight Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation CPR-certified veterinary students.Measurements and main resultsFive groups of participants each conducted 3 CPR simulations in configurations of 4, 6, and 8 rescuers. Simulations represented a shock patient declining into asystole, followed by ventricular fibrillation and return of spontaneous circulation. Resuscitation efforts were video-recorded to evaluate BLS and ALS tasks. Mean (±SD) was derived and data were compared among team sizes using ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc analysis. Significance was set at P < 0.05. Among teams of 4, 6, and 8 rescuers, time to first chest compression (13 s [±6], 9 s [±2], 8 s [±4]; P = 0.24) and positive-pressure breath (101 s [±37], 56 s [±15], 67 s [±24]; P = 0.05) were not significantly different. Chest compression (100/min [±5], 108/min [±6], 107/min [±6]; P = 0.12) and ventilatory rates (9/min [±1], respectively, P = 0.52) were not significantly different. Time without chest compressions/total length of CPR was not significantly different (72 s [±16], 61 s [±16], 54 s [±8]; P = 0.15). Capnography and ECG monitoring were used by all teams. Time to first vasopressor administration was significantly different among team sizes (268 s [±70], 164 s [±65], 174 s [±34]; P = 0.04), with vasopressors being most quickly administered by teams of 6 rescuers. Time to electrical defibrillation was not significantly different (486 s [±45], 424 s [±22], 488 s [±181]; P = 0.57). Incorrect ALS interventions occurred in 60%, 0%, and 40% of CPR events in 4, 6, and 8 rescuer teams, respectively.ConclusionsAlthough the achievement of BLS tasks was comparable in teams of 4 rescuers, teams of 6 rescuers may be preferable based on differences in the rate of guideline-incompliant treatments and ALS task efficiency. Teams of 8 rescuers were neither more efficient nor more accurate at conducting BLS and ALS tasks.

Project description:Medical residents are often responsible for leading and performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation; however, their levels of expertise and comfort as leaders of advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS) teams vary widely. While the current American Heart Association ACLS course provides education in recommended resuscitative protocols, training in leadership skills is insufficient. In this article, we describe the design and implementation in our institution of a formative curriculum aimed at improving residents' readiness for being leaders of ACLS teams using human patient simulation. Human patient simulation refers to a variety of technologies using mannequins with realistic features, which allows learners to practice through scenarios without putting patients at risk. We discuss the limitations of the program and the challenges encountered in implementation. We also provide a description of the initiation and organization of the program. Case scenarios and assessment tools are provided.Our simulation-based training curriculum consists of 8 simulated patient scenarios during four 1-hour sessions. Postgraduate year-2 and 3 internal medicine residents participate in this program in teams of 4. Assessment tools are utilized only for formative evaluation. Debriefing is used as a teaching strategy for the individual resident leader of the ACLS team to facilitate learning and improve performance. To evaluate the impact of the curriculum, we administered a survey before and after the intervention. The survey consisted of 10 questions answered on a 5-point Likert scale, which addressed residents' confidence in leading ACLS teams, management of the equipment, and management of cardiac rhythms. Respondents' mean presimulation (ie, baseline) and postsimulation (ie, outcome) scores were compared using a 2-sample t test. Residents' overall confidence score improved from 2.8 to 3.9 (P < 0.001; mean improvement, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-1.6). The average score for performing and leading ACLS teams improved from 2.8 to 4 (P < 0.001; mean difference, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-1.7). There was a uniform increase in the residents' self-confidence in their role as effective leaders of ACLS teams, and residents valued this simulation-based training program.

Project description:BackgroundThe quality of Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Automated External Defibrillations (AED) treatment provided by individual practitioners is the most important factor in surviving an in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA); therefore, healthcare professionals (HCPs) require sufficient resuscitation competency. This study aimed to analyze the effects of a blended team-based CPR and AED simulation training (riAniMO program) on HCPs performance, satisfaction and perception on transferability, and costs.MethodsThe riAniMO is based on a multimedia training program with video lessons and a virtual CPR resuscitation simulation, and a team-based CPR and AED simulation. The study utilized a mixed-method design. The quantitative phase involved a retrospective cohort study with a comparison group to assess the impact of the riAniMO. Meanwhile, the qualitative phase involved four focus groups (FGs) to investigate the viewpoints of professionals on the strengths and limitations of the riAniMO. We compared the 845 HCPs who participated in the BLSD (Basic Life Support- early Defibrillation) re-training program with ERC (European Resuscitation Council) approach and the 1,167 who participated in the riAniMO re-training program. BLSD re-training took place between January and December 2019 and riAniMO re-training took place between January and December 2022.ResultsFrom quantitative analysis, a slight increase in the number of HCPs satisfied with retraining in the riAniMO group compared to the BLSD group was found. However, the percentage of HCPs certified decreased by 9% in the riAniMo group (90.2%) compared to the BLSD group (99.2%). The RiAniMO approach resulted in cost savings by training 322 more healthcare providers and saving € 61.7 per participant. From the FG analysis, five themes emerged: 1) Realism in Learning: Experimenting in your own operating context and using your own devices; 2) Strength of the working group and multidisciplinarity; 3) Improved perception of training burden; 4) Facilitator as consultant and guide, which provides real-time situational feedback; 5) Transparency on evaluations and certifications for the simulations.ConclusionsThe riAniMO approach maintained high standards in terms of HCPs' satisfaction and performance and seemed to be cost-saving. Further studies are necessary to verify the long-term effectiveness of training methods for team-based CPR and AED simulation.

Project description:High-fidelity simulation (HFS) is a learning method which has proven effective in medical education for technical and non-technical skills. However, its effectiveness for knowledge acquisition is less validated. We performed a randomized study with the primary aim of investigating whether HFS, in association with frontal lessons, would improve knowledge about advanced life support (ALS), in comparison to frontal lessons only among medical students. The secondary aims were to evaluate the effect of HFS on knowledge acquisition of different sections of ALS and personal knowledge perception. Participants answered a pre-test questionnaire consisting of a subjective (evaluating personal perception of knowledge) and an objective section (measuring level of knowledge) containing 100 questions about algorithms, technical skills, team working/early warning scores/communication strategies according to ALS guidelines. All students participated in 3 frontal lessons before being randomized in group S, undergoing a HFS session, and group C, receiving no further interventions. After 10 days from the end of each intervention, both groups answered a questionnaire (post-test) with the same subjective section but a different objective one. The overall number of correct answers of the post-test was significantly higher in group S (mean 74.1, SD 11.2) than in group C (mean 65.5, SD 14.3), p = 0.0017, 95% C.I. 3.34 - 13.9. A significantly higher number of correct answers was reported in group S than in group C for questions investigating knowledge of algorithms (p = 0.0001; 95% C.I 2.22-5.99) and team working/early warning scores/communication strategies (p = 0.0060; 95% C.I 1.13-6.53). Students in group S showed a significantly higher score in the post-test subjective section (p = 0.0074). A lower proportion of students in group S confirmed their perception of knowledge compared to group C (p = 0.0079). HFS showed a beneficial effect on knowledge of ALS among medical students, especially for notions of algorithms and team working/early warning scores/communication.

Project description:BACKGROUND:The incidence of cardiac arrests per year in the United States continues to increase, yet in-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates significantly vary between hospitals. Current methods of training are expensive, time consuming, and difficult to scale, which necessitates improvements in advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training. Virtual reality (VR) has been proposed as an alternative or adjunct to high-fidelity simulation (HFS) in several environments. No evaluations to date have explored the ability of a VR program to examine both technical and behavioral skills and demonstrate a cost comparison. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to explore the utility of a voice-based VR ACLS team leader refresher as compared with HFS. METHODS:This prospective observational study performed at an academic institution consisted of 25 postgraduate year 2 residents. Participants were randomized to HFS or VR training and then crossed groups after a 2-week washout. Participants were graded on technical and nontechnical skills. Participants also completed self-assessments about the modules. Proctors were assessed for fatigue and task saturation, and cost analysis based on local economic data was performed. RESULTS:A total of 23 of 25 participants were included in the scoring analysis. Fewer participants were familiar with VR compared with HFS (9/25, 36% vs 25/25, 100%; P<.001). Self-reported satisfaction and utilization scores were similar; however, significantly more participants felt HFS provided better feedback: 99 (IQR 89-100) vs 79 (IQR 71-88); P<.001. Technical scores were higher in the HFS group; however, nontechnical scores for decision making and communication were not significantly different between modalities. VR sessions were 21 (IQR 19-24) min shorter than HFS sessions, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration task load index scores for proctors were lower in each category, and VR sessions were estimated to be US $103.68 less expensive in a single-learner, single-session model. CONCLUSIONS:Utilization of a VR-based team leader refresher for ACLS skills is comparable with HFS in several areas, including learner satisfaction. The VR module was more cost-effective and was easier to proctor; however, HFS was better at delivering feedback to participants. Optimal education strategies likely contain elements of both modalities. Further studies are needed to examine the utility of VR-based environments at scale.

Dataset Information

Effect of a hybrid team-based advanced cardiopulmonary life support simulation program for clinical nurses.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Effect of a hybrid team-based advanced cardiopulmonary life support simulation program for clinical nurses.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets