Optimizing murine sample sizes for RNA-seq studies revealed from large-scale comparative analysis
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA1135223 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR29809000.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR29809100.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR29809200.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR29809300.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR29809400.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 479 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:In order to determine the N, the usual approach is to perform a power calculation, which involves understanding the variability between samples and the expected effect size. Here, we focused on bulk RNA-seq experiments, which have become ubiquitous in biology, but which have many unknown or difficult to estimate parameters, and so the required analyses to determine the minimum N is typically lacking. We therefore performed two N=30 profiling studies between wild-type mice and mice in which one copy of a gene had been deleted, to determine how many mice would be required to minimize false positives and to maximize true discoveries found in the N of 30 experiment
2025-02-11 | GSE272152 | GEO
Project description:Two proteomic methods were recently introduced to globally map proteolytic cleavage events in biological systems, one that characterized proteolyzed proteins by differential gel migration (PROTOMAP) and the other by enzymatic tagging and enrichment of the nascent N-terminal peptides generated by proteolysis (Subtiligase). Both technologies were applied to apoptosis, and each uncovered hundreds of novel proteolytic events. An initial survey, however, revealed only minimal overlap in the two data sets. In this article, we perform an in-depth comparative analysis of the PROTOMAP and Subtiligase results that assimilates the complementary information acquired by each method. This analysis uncovered substantial agreement between the PROTOMAP and Subtiligase data sets, which in integrated form yield a highly enriched portrait of the proteome-wide impact of proteolysis in apoptosis. We discuss the respective strengths of each proteomic method and the potential for these technologies to expand the scope and sensitivity of large-scale studies of proteolysis in biological systems.
| S-EPMC3150830 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10555669 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In recent years, nonhuman ancient DNA studies have begun to focus on larger sample sizes and whole genomes, offering the potential to reveal exciting and hitherto unknown answers to ongoing biological and archaeological questions. However, one major limitation to such studies is the substantial financial and time investments still required during sample screening, due to uncertainty regarding successful sample selection. This study investigates the effect of a wide range of sample properties including latitude, sample age, skeletal element, collagen preservation, and context on endogenous content and DNA damage profiles for 317 ancient and historic pinniped samples collected from across the North Atlantic and surrounding regions. Using generalised linear and mixed-effect models, we found that a range of factors affected DNA preservation within each of the species under consideration. The most important findings were that endogenous content varied significantly within species according to context, the type of skeletal element, the collagen content and collection year. There also appears to be an effect of the sample's geographic origin, with samples from the Arctic generally showing higher endogenous content and lower damage rates. Both latitude and sample age were found to have significant relationships with damage levels, but only for walrus samples. Sex, ontogenetic age and extraction material preparation were not found to have any significant relationship with DNA preservation. Overall, skeletal element and sample context were found to be the most influential factors and should therefore be considered when selecting samples for large-scale ancient genome studies.
| S-EPMC8248401 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSerological studies rely on the recruitment of representative cohorts; however, such efforts are specially complicated by the conditions surrounding the COVID19 pandemic.MethodsWe aimed to design and implement a fully remote methodology for conducting safe serological surveys that also allow for the engagement of representative study populations.ResultsThis design was well-received and effective. 2,066 participants ≥18 years old were enrolled, reflecting the ethnic and racial composition of Massachusetts. >70% of them reported being satisfied/extremely satisfied with the online enrollment and at-home self-collection of blood samples. While 18.6% reported some discomfort experienced with the collection process, 72.2% stated that they would be willing to test weekly if enrolled in a long-term study.ConclusionsHigh engagement and positive feedback from participants, as well as the quality of self-collected specimens, point to the usefulness of this fully remote, self-collection-based study design for future safer and efficient population-level serological surveys.
| S-EPMC8568136 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A central challenge in the analysis of genetic variation is to provide realistic genome simulation across millions of samples. Present day coalescent simulations do not scale well, or use approximations that fail to capture important long-range linkage properties. Analysing the results of simulations also presents a substantial challenge, as current methods to store genealogies consume a great deal of space, are slow to parse and do not take advantage of shared structure in correlated trees. We solve these problems by introducing sparse trees and coalescence records as the key units of genealogical analysis. Using these tools, exact simulation of the coalescent with recombination for chromosome-sized regions over hundreds of thousands of samples is possible, and substantially faster than present-day approximate methods. We can also analyse the results orders of magnitude more quickly than with existing methods.
| S-EPMC4856371 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and objectives Reference ranges are widely used to locate the major range of the target probability distribution. When future measurements fall outside the reference range, they are classified as atypical and require further investigation. The fundamental principles and statistical properties of reference ranges are closely related to those of tolerance interval procedures. Existing investigations of reference ranges and tolerance intervals mainly devoted to the primitive cases of one- and paired-sample designs. Although reference ranges hold considerable promise for parallel group designs, the corresponding methodological and computational issues for determining reference limits and sample sizes have not been adequately addressed. Methods This paper describes a complete collection of one- and two-sided reference ranges for assessing measurement differences in parallel-group studies that assume variance homogeneity. Results The problem of sample size determination for precise reference ranges is also examined under the expected half-width and assurance probability considerations. Unlike the current methods, the suggested sample size criteria explicitly accommodate desired interval width in precise interval estimation. Conclusions Theoretical examinations and empirical assessments are presented to validate the usefulness of the proposed reference range and sample size procedures. To enhance the usages of the recommended techniques in practical applications, computer programs are developed for efficient calculation and exact analysis. A real data example regarding tablet absorption rate and extent is presented to illustrate the suggested assessments between two drug formulations.
| S-EPMC9710766 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Optimizing high molecular weight extractions
| PRJNA1114081 | ENA
Project description:Repeated measurements of household air pollution may provide better estimates of average exposure but can add to costs and participant burden. In a randomized trial of gas versus biomass cookstoves in four countries, we took supplemental personal 24-h measurements on a 10% subsample for mothers and infants, interspersed between protocol samples. Mothers had up to five postrandomization protocol measurements over 16 months, while infants had three measurements over one year. For the subsample, we added up to 6 supplemental postrandomization samples for mothers and 3 for infants, measuring PM2.5, black carbon (BC) (mothers only), and carbon monoxide (CO) at each visit. 310 mothers had both protocol (n = 1026) and supplemental (n = 1099) valid exposure measurements. For children, supplemental data sufficient for analysis were collected in only two countries; 94 infants had both protocol (n = 317) and supplemental (n = 234) samples. The geometric means for protocol and supplemental samples for mothers for PM2.5 were 37 μg/m3 and 38 μg/m3, respectively, while for infants, they were 42 μg/m3 and 46 μg/m3. Mixed models comparing supplemental to protocol samples, controlling for covariates, found few differences between protocol and supplemental samples. Supplemental analyses among control mothers with complete protocol measurements found that an average of three measurements explained 81% of the variance of the average of all six measurements.
| S-EPMC11780738 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Despite a growing body of research suggesting that task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies often suffer from a lack of statistical power due to too-small samples, the proliferation of such underpowered studies continues unabated. Using large independent samples across eleven tasks, we demonstrate the impact of sample size on replicability, assessed at different levels of analysis relevant to fMRI researchers. We find that the degree of replicability for typical sample sizes is modest and that sample sizes much larger than typical (e.g., N = 100) produce results that fall well short of perfectly replicable. Thus, our results join the existing line of work advocating for larger sample sizes. Moreover, because we test sample sizes over a fairly large range and use intuitive metrics of replicability, our hope is that our results are more understandable and convincing to researchers who may have found previous results advocating for larger samples inaccessible.
| S-EPMC6123695 | biostudies-literature