Dataset Information

Total marrow irradiation versus total body irradiation using intensity-modulated helical tomotherapy.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Total body irradiation (TBI) is often a component of the conditioning regimen prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematological malignancies. However, total marrow irradiation (TMI) could be an alternative method for reducing radiation therapy-associated toxicity, as it specifically targets the skeleton and thus could better protect organs at risk. Here, we compared dosimetric changes in irradiation received by the target volume and organs at risk between TBI and TMI plans.

Materials and methods

Theoretical TMI plans were calculated for 35 patients with various hematological malignancies who had already received TBI in our clinic. We then statistically compared irradiation doses between the new TMI plans and existing TBI plans. We examined whether TMI provides greater protection of organs at risk while maintaining the prescribed dose in the targeted skeletal area. We also compared beam-on times between TBI and TMI.

Results

TMI planning achieved significant reductions in the mean, minimum, and maximum irradiation doses in the lungs, kidneys, liver, spleen, and body (i.e., remaining tissue except organs and skeleton). In particular, the mean dose was reduced by 49% in the liver and spleen and by 55-59% in the kidneys. Moreover, TMI planning reduced the corpus beam-on time by an average of 217 s.

Conclusion

TMI planning achieved significant dose reduction in organs at risk while still achieving the prescribed dose in the target volume. Additionally, TMI planning reduced the beam-on time for corpus plans despite a high modulation factor.

SUBMITTER: Koksal M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10356893 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Total marrow irradiation versus total body irradiation using intensity-modulated helical tomotherapy.

Köksal Mümtaz M Kersting Laura L Schoroth Felix F Garbe Stephan S Koch David D Scafa Davide D Sarria Gustavo R GR Leitzen Christina C Heine Annkristin A Holderried Tobias T Brossart Peter P Zoga Eleni E Attenberger Ulrike U Schmeel Leonard C LC

Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 20230106 9

<h4>Background</h4>Total body irradiation (TBI) is often a component of the conditioning regimen prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematological malignancies. However, total marrow irradiation (TMI) could be an alternative method for reducing radiation therapy-associated toxicity, as it specifically targets the skeleton and thus could better protect organs at risk. Here, we compared dosimetric changes in irradiation received by the target volume and organs at risk ...[more]

PMID: 36607428

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectivesIntensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) helps achieve good radiation dose conformity and precise dose evaluation. We conducted a single-centre prospective study to assess the safety and feasibility of total body irradiation with IMRT (IMRT-TBI) using helical tomotherapy in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).Patients and methodsThirty-nine adult patients with haematological malignancy (acute lymphoblastic leukaemia [n = 21], chronic myeloid leukaemia [n = 6], mixed phenotype acute leukaemia [n = 5], acute myeloid leukaemia [n = 4], and malignant lymphoma [n = 3]) who received 12 Gy IMRT-TBI were enrolled with a median follow-up of 934.5 (range, 617-1254) d. At the time of transplantation, 33 patients (85%) achieved complete remission. The conditioning regimen used IMRT-TBI (12 Gy in 6 fractions twice daily, for 3 d) and cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg/d, for 2 d), seven patients were combined with cytarabine, and five with etoposide. We set dose constraints for the lungs, kidneys and lens as the organs at risk.ResultsThe mean doses for the lungs and kidneys were 7.50 and 9.11 Gy, respectively. The mean maximum dose for the lens (right/left) was 5.75/5.87 Gy. The 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 69, 64, 18 and 18%, respectively. Thirty-six patients developed early adverse events (AEs) (including four patients with Grade 3/4 toxicities), most of which were reversible oral mucositis and may partially have been related to IMRT-TBI. However, the incidence of toxicity was comparable to conventional TBI-based conditioning transplantation. None of the patients developed primary graft failure, or Grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In late complications, chronic kidney disease was observed in six patients, a lower incidence compared to conventional TBI-based conditioning transplantation. No radiation pneumonitis or cataracts were observed in any of the patients.ConclusionsIMRT-TBI is safe and feasible for haematological malignancies with acceptable clinical outcomes.KEY MESSAGESIMRT-TBI-helical tomotherapy aids in accurate dose calculation and conformity.It could be used without any considerable increase in the rate of TBI-related AEs.Allo-HSCT with IMRT-TBI may be an alternative to conventional TBI for clinical use.

Project description:PurposeThe goal of this study is to investigate treatment planning of total marrow irradiation (TMI) using intensity-modulated spot-scanning proton therapy (IMPT). The dosimetric parameters of the intensity-modulated proton plans were evaluated and compared with the corresponding TMI plans generated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using photon beams.MethodsIntensity-modulated proton plans for TMI were created using the Monte Carlo dose-calculation algorithm in the Raystation 11A treatment planning system with spot-scanning proton beams from the MEVION S250i Hyperscan system. Treatment plans were generated with four isocenters placed along the longitudinal direction, each with a set of five beams for a total of 20 beams. VMAT-TMI plans were generated with the Eclipse-V15 analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) using a Varian Trilogy machine. Three planning target volumes (PTVs) for the bones, ribs, and spleen were covered by 12 Gy. The dose conformity index, D80, D50, and D10, for PTVs and organs at risk (OARs) for the IMPT plans were quantified and compared with the corresponding VMAT plans.ResultsThe mean dose for most of the OARs was reduced substantially (5% and more) in the IMPT plans for TMI in comparison with VMAT plans except for the esophagus and thyroid, which experienced an increase in dose. This dose reduction is due to the fast dose falloff of the distal Bragg peak in the proton plans. The conformity index was found to be similar (0.78 vs 0.75) for the photon and proton plans. IMPT plans provided superior superficial dose coverage for the skull and ribs in comparison with VMAT because of increased entrance dose deposition by the proton beams.ConclusionTreatment plans for TMI generated with IMPT were superior to VMAT plans mainly due to a large reduction in the OAR dose. Although the current IMPT-TMI technique is not clinically practical due to the long overall treatment time, this study presents an enticing alternative to conventional TMI with photons by providing superior dose coverage of the targets, increased sparing of the OARs, and enhanced radiobiological effects associated with proton therapy.

Project description:Optimized conformal total body irradiation (OC-TBI) is a highly conformal image guided method for irradiating the whole human body while sparing the selected organs at risk (OARs) (lungs, kidneys, lens). This study investigated the safety and feasibility of pediatric OC-TBI with the helical TomoTherapy (TomoTherapy) and volumetric modulated arc (VMAT) modalities and their implementation in routine clinical practice. This is the first study comparing the TomoTherapy and VMAT modalities in terms of treatment planning, dose delivery accuracy, and toxicity for OC-TBI in a single-center setting. The OC-TBI method with standardized dosimetric criteria was developed and implemented with TomoTherapy. The same OC-TBI approach was applied for VMAT. Standardized treatment steps, namely, positioning and immobilization, contouring, treatment planning strategy, plan evaluation, quality assurance, visualization and treatment delivery procedure were implemented for 157 patients treated with TomoTherapy and 52 patients treated with VMAT. Both modalities showed acceptable quality of the planned target volume dose coverage with simultaneous OARs sparing. The homogeneity of target irradiation was superior for TomoTherapy. Overall assessment of the OC-TBI dose delivery was performed for 30 patients treated with VMAT and 30 patients treated with TomoTherapy. The planned and delivered (sum of doses for all fractions) doses were compared for the two modalities in groups of patients with different heights. The near maximum dose values of the lungs and kidneys showed the most significant variation between the planned and delivered doses for both modalities. Differences in the patient size did not result in statistically significant differences for most of the investigated parameters in either the TomoTherapy or VMAT modality. TomoTherapy-based OC-TBI showed lower variations between planned and delivered doses, was less time-consuming and was easier to implement in routine practice than VMAT. We did not observe significant differences in acute and subacute toxicity between TomoTherapy and VMAT groups. The late toxicity from kidneys and lungs was not found during the 2.3 years follow up period. The study demonstrates that both modalities are feasible, safe and show acceptable toxicity. The standardized approaches allowed us to implement pediatric OC-TBI in routine clinical practice.

Project description:IntroductionVolumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) total body irradiation (TBI) allows for greater organ sparing with improved target coverage compared to 2D-TBI. However, there is limited evidence of whether improved organ sparing translates to decreases in toxicities and how its toxicities compare to those of the 2D technique. We aimed to compare differences in toxicities among patients treated with TBI utilizing VMAT and 2D techniques.Methods/materialsA matched-pair single-institution retrospective analysis of 200 patients treated with TBI from 2014 to 2023 was performed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. Differences in characteristics and toxicities between the VMAT and 2D cohorts were compared using Fisher's exact test.ResultsOf the 200 patients analyzed, 100 underwent VMAT-TBI, and 100 underwent 2D-TBI. The median age for VMAT-TBI and 2D-TBI patients was 13.7 years and 16.2 years, respectively (p = 0.25). In each cohort, 53 patients were treated with myeloablative regimens (8-13.76 Gy), and 47 were treated with non-myeloablative regimens (2-4 Gy). For the entire VMAT-TBI cohort, lung Dmean, kidney Dmean, and lens Dmax were spared to 60.6% ± 5.0%, 71.0% ± 8.5%, and 90.1% ± 3.5% of prescription, respectively. For the non-myeloablative VMAT-TBI cohort, testis/ovary Dmax, brain, and thyroid Dmean were spared to 33.4% ± 7.3%, 75.4% ± 7.0%, and 76.1% ± 10.5%, respectively. For 2D-TBI, lungs were spared using partial-transmission lung blocks for myeloablative regimens. The VMAT-TBI cohort experienced significantly lower rates of any grade of pneumonitis (2% vs. 12%), nephrotoxicity (7% vs. 34%), nausea (68% vs. 81%), skin (16% vs. 35%), and graft versus host disease (GVHD) (42% vs. 62%) compared to 2D-TBI patients. For myeloablative regimen patients, rates of pneumonitis (0% vs. 17%) and nephrotoxicity (9% vs. 36%) were significantly lower with VMAT-TBI versus 2D-TBI (p < 0.01). Median follow-up was 14.3 months, and neither median OS nor PFS for the entire cohort was reached. In the VMAT versus 2D-TBI cohort, the 1-year OS was 86.0% versus 83.0% (p = 0.26), and the 1-year PFS was 86.6% and 80.0% (p = 0.36), respectively.ConclusionNormal tissue sparing with VMAT-TBI compared to the 2D-TBI translated to significantly lower rates of pneumonitis, renal toxicity, nausea, skin toxicity, and GVHD in patients, while maintaining excellent disease control.

Dataset Information

Total marrow irradiation versus total body irradiation using intensity-modulated helical tomotherapy.

Background

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Total marrow irradiation versus total body irradiation using intensity-modulated helical tomotherapy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets