Dataset Information

Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: a population-based cohort study of 1.3 million women in Norway.

ABSTRACT:

Background

It is important to monitor the association between menopausal hormone therapy (HT) use and breast cancer (BC) risk with contemporary estimates, and specifically focus on HT types and new drugs.

Methods

We estimated hazard ratios (HR) of BC risk according to HT type, administration route and individual drugs, overall and stratified by body mass index (BMI), molecular subtype and detection mode, with non-HT use as reference.

Results

We included 1,275,783 women, 45+ years, followed from 2004, for a median of 12.7 years. Oral oestrogen combined with daily progestin was associated with the highest risk of BC (HR 2.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.31-2.54), with drug-specific HRs ranging from Cliovelle®: 1.63 (95% CI 1.35-1.96) to Kliogest®: 2.67 (2.37-3.00). Vaginal oestradiol was not associated with BC risk. HT use was more strongly associated with luminal A cancer (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.86-2.09) than other molecular subtypes, and more strongly with interval (HR 2.00, 95% CI: 1.83-2.30) than screen-detected (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.26-1.41) BC in women 50-71 years. HRs for HT use decreased with increasing BMI.

Conclusions

The use of oral and transdermal HT was associated with an increased risk of BC. The associations varied according to HT type, individual drugs, molecular subtype, detection mode and BMI.

SUBMITTER: Stoer NC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC11231299 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: a population-based cohort study of 1.3 million women in Norway.

Støer Nathalie C NC Vangen Siri S Singh Deependra D Fortner Renée T RT Hofvind Solveig S Ursin Giske G Botteri Edoardo E

British journal of cancer 20240513 1

<h4>Background</h4>It is important to monitor the association between menopausal hormone therapy (HT) use and breast cancer (BC) risk with contemporary estimates, and specifically focus on HT types and new drugs.<h4>Methods</h4>We estimated hazard ratios (HR) of BC risk according to HT type, administration route and individual drugs, overall and stratified by body mass index (BMI), molecular subtype and detection mode, with non-HT use as reference.<h4>Results</h4>We included 1,275,783 women, 45+ ...[more]

PMID: 38740969

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceMenopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is the treatment of choice for symptoms of menopause. However, its adoption is hindered by the risk-benefit trade-off in relation to acute and chronic diseases.ObjectiveTo evaluate trends in and correlates of MHT use among postmenopausal women in the US from 1999 to March 2020.Design, setting, and participantsThis serial cross-sectional analysis of MHT use used data from the nationally representative National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Participants included noninstitutionalized US postmenopausal women from 10 NHANES study cycles (1999-2000 to 2017-March 2020 [pre-COVID-19 pandemic]). Data were analyzed from December 2023 to April 2024.ExposuresNHANES study cycle.Main outcomes and measuresPrevalence of MHT use was extracted from the prescription medication data collected during NHANES household interviews. MHT formulations were determined by hormone type.ResultsData on 13 048 US postmenopausal women (47.1% ≥65 years old) were analyzed. From 1999 to 2020, the prevalence of MHT use decreased among women of all age groups, from 26.9% (95% CI, 22.6%-31.7%) in 1999 to 4.7% (95% CI, 3.4%-6.5%) in 2020. Until 2002, MHT use was highest among women aged 52 to 65 years, but since 2005, MHT use has been highest among women younger than 52 years. MHT use decreased by 23.5% (95% CI, 11.4%-35.6%), 31.4% (95% CI, 23.4%-39.5%), and 10.6% (95% CI, 6.3%-14.8%) for women younger than 52 years, 52 years to younger than 65 years, and 65 years and older, respectively. Prevalence of MHT use decreased from 13.8% (95% CI, 8.5%-21.7%) to 2.6% (95% CI, 1.5%-4.6%) for Hispanic women, 11.9% (95% CI, 8.5%-16.3%) to 0.5% (95% CI, 0.2%-1.1%) for non-Hispanic Black women, and 31.4% (95% CI, 27.1%-36.1%) to 5.8% (95% CI, 4.1%-8.2%) for non-Hispanic White women. Non-Hispanic White women consistently had the highest prevalence of MHT use. Estrogen-only formulation accounted for more than 50% of the MHT for most study periods. The prevalence of MHT use varied by family income-to-poverty ratio, health insurance coverage in all racial and ethnic groups, weight, and smoking status among non-Hispanic White women, as well as by education attainment among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women.Conclusions and relevanceResults of this cross-sectional study show that over the past 2 decades, MHT use declined among US postmenopausal women of all age and racial and ethnic groups. Women of racial and ethnic minority groups had lower prevalence of MHT use compared to non-Hispanic White women.

Project description:BackgroundMenopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is associated with an increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer, predominantly the luminal A-like subtype. The impact of MHT on deaths from breast cancer subtypes is less understood. This study aimed to explore associations between MHT use and the incidence, mortality, and survival of intrinsic-like breast cancer subtypes.MethodsData from 160,881 participants with self-reported MHT use from the prospective Norwegian Women and Cancer Study were analyzed. Among them, 7,844 incident breast cancer cases, and 721 breast cancer-specific deaths occurred. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between MHT use and the incidence, mortality, and survival of breast cancer subtypes.ResultsMHT use was associated with increased risk of overall, luminal A-like, and luminal B-like breast cancer, with respective HRs of 1.44 (95% CI 1.36-1.52), 1.41 (95% CI 1.31-1.52), and 1.23 (95% CI 1.09-1.40) among current estrogen-progestin therapy (EPT) users compared with never users. The risk increased by 4%, 4%, and 2% per year of EPT use for overall, luminal A-like, and luminal B-like breast cancers, respectively. MHT use was also associated with increased risk of overall and luminal A-like breast cancer mortality, with HRs 1.61% (95% CI 1.36-1.91) and 2.15% (95% CI 1.51-3.05) increased risk among current EPT users compared with non-users. Among patients with breast cancer, pre-diagnostic MHT use was not associated with worse survival from overall breast cancer but was inversely associated with survival from triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC; HR death 0.41; 95% CI 0.24-0.73 among current users). Results varied significantly according to tumor subtype (pheterogeneity = 0.02).ConclusionsOur study suggests that MHT use increases the risk of incident and fatal overall and luminal A-like, and incident luminal B-like breast cancer but does not decrease overall survival among patients with breast cancer. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying MHT use and breast cancer lethality, and to explore whether MHT use among patients with TNBC is indeed free from harm.

Project description:BackgroundMenopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is a risk factor for breast cancer (BC). Evidence suggests that its effect on BC risk could be partly mediated by mammographic density. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between MHT, mammographic density and BC risk using data from a prospective study.MethodsWe used data from a case-control study nested within the French cohort E3N including 453 cases and 453 matched controls. Measures of mammographic density, history of MHT use during follow-up and information on potential confounders were available for all women. The association between MHT and mammographic density was evaluated by linear regression models. We applied mediation modelling techniques to estimate, under the hypothesis of a causal model, the proportion of the effect of MHT on BC risk mediated by percent mammographic density (PMD) for BC overall and by hormone receptor status.ResultsAmong MHT users, 4.2% used exclusively oestrogen alone compared with 68.3% who used exclusively oestrogens plus progestogens. Mammographic density was higher in current users (for a 60-year-old woman, mean PMD 33%; 95% CI 31 to 35%) than in past (29%; 27 to 31%) and never users (24%; 22 to 26%). No statistically significant association was observed between duration of MHT and mammographic density. In past MHT users, mammographic density was negatively associated with time since last use; values similar to those of never users were observed in women who had stopped MHT at least 8 years earlier. The odds ratio of BC for current versus never MHT users, adjusted for age, year of birth, menopausal status at baseline and BMI, was 1.67 (95% CI, 1.04 to 2.68). The proportion of effect mediated by PMD was 34% for any BC and became 48% when the correlation between BMI and PMD was accounted for. These effects were limited to hormone receptor-positive BC.ConclusionsOur results suggest that, under a causal model, nearly half of the effect of MHT on hormone receptor-positive BC risk is mediated by mammographic density, which appears to be modified by MHT for up to 8 years after MHT termination.

Dataset Information

Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: a population-based cohort study of 1.3 million women in Norway.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: a population-based cohort study of 1.3 million women in Norway.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets