Dataset Information

Non-Newtonian Endothelial Shear Stress Simulation: Does It Matter?

ABSTRACT: Patient-specific coronary endothelial shear stress (ESS) calculations using Newtonian and non-Newtonian rheological models were performed to assess whether the common assumption of Newtonian blood behavior offers similar results to a more realistic but computationally expensive non-Newtonian model. 16 coronary arteries (from 16 patients) were reconstructed from optical coherence tomographic (OCT) imaging. Pulsatile CFD simulations using Newtonian and the Quemada non-Newtonian model were performed. Endothelial shear stress (ESS) and other indices were compared. Exploratory indices including local blood viscosity (LBV) were calculated from non-Newtonian simulation data. Compared to the Newtonian results, the non-Newtonian model estimates significantly higher time-averaged ESS (1.69 (IQR 1.36)Pa versus 1.28 (1.16)Pa, p < 0.001) and ESS gradient (0.90 (1.20)Pa/mm versus 0.74 (1.03)Pa/mm, p < 0.001) throughout the cardiac cycle, under-estimating the low ESS (<1Pa) area (37.20 ± 13.57% versus 50.43 ± 14.16%, 95% CI 11.28-15.18, p < 0.001). Similar results were also found in the idealized artery simulations with non-Newtonian median ESS being higher than the Newtonian median ESS (healthy segments: 0.8238Pa versus 0.6618Pa, p < 0.001 proximal; 0.8179Pa versus 0.6610Pa, p < 0.001 distal; stenotic segments: 0.8196Pa versus 0.6611Pa, p < 0.001 proximal; 0.2546Pa versus 0.2245Pa, p < 0.001 distal) On average, the non-Newtonian model has a LBV of 1.45 times above the Newtonian model with an average peak LBV of 40-fold. Non-Newtonian blood model estimates higher quantitative ESS values than the Newtonian model. Incorporation of non-Newtonian blood behavior may improve the accuracy of ESS measurements. The non-Newtonian model also allows calculation of exploratory viscosity-based hemodynamic indices, such as local blood viscosity, which may offer additional information to detect underlying atherosclerosis.

SUBMITTER: Thondapu V

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9046559 | biostudies-literature | 2022

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Non-Newtonian Endothelial Shear Stress Simulation: Does It Matter?

Thondapu Vikas V Shishikura Daisuke D Dijkstra Jouke J Zhu Shuang J SJ Revalor Eve E Serruys Patrick W PW van Gaal William J WJ Poon Eric K W EKW Ooi Andrew A Barlis Peter P

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine 20220414

Patient-specific coronary endothelial shear stress (ESS) calculations using Newtonian and non-Newtonian rheological models were performed to assess whether the common assumption of Newtonian blood behavior offers similar results to a more realistic but computationally expensive non-Newtonian model. 16 coronary arteries (from 16 patients) were reconstructed from optical coherence tomographic (OCT) imaging. Pulsatile CFD simulations using Newtonian and the Quemada non-Newtonian model were performe ...[more]

PMID: 35497989

Similar Datasets

Project description:The monolayer of cells that line both the heart and the entire vasculature is the endothelial cell (EC). These cells respond to external and internal signals, producing a wide array of primary or secondary messengers involved in coagulation, vascular tone, inflammation, and cell-to-cell signaling. Endothelial cell activation is the process by which EC changes from a quiescent cell phenotype, which maintains cellular integrity, antithrombotic, and anti-inflammatory properties, to a phenotype that is prothrombotic, pro-inflammatory, and permeable, in addition to repair and leukocyte trafficking at the site of injury or infection. Pathological activation of EC leads to increased vascular permeability, thrombosis, and an uncontrolled inflammatory response that leads to endothelial dysfunction. This pathological activation can be observed during ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) and sepsis. Shear stress (SS) and pulsatile shear stress (PSS) are produced by mechanical frictional forces of blood flow and contraction of the heart, respectively, and are well-known mechanical signals that affect EC function, morphology, and gene expression. PSS promotes EC homeostasis and cardiovascular health. The archetype of inducing PSS is exercise (i.e., jogging, which introduces pulsations to the body as a function of the foot striking the pavement), or mechanical devices which induce external pulsations to the body (Enhanced External Pulsation (EECP), Whole-body vibration (WBV), and Whole-body periodic acceleration (WBPA aka pGz)). The purpose of this narrative review is to focus on the aforementioned noninvasive methods to increase PSS, review how each of these modify specific diseases that have been shown to induce endothelial activation and microcirculatory dysfunction (Ischemia reperfusion injury-myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest and resuscitation), sepsis, and lipopolysaccharide-induced sepsis syndrome (LPS)), and review current evidence and insight into how each may modify endothelial activation and how these may be beneficial in the acute and chronic setting of endothelial activation and microvascular dysfunction.

Project description:Blood flow produces mechanical frictional forces, parallel to the blood flow exerted on the endothelial wall of the vessel, the so-called wall shear stress (WSS). WSS sensing is associated with several vascular pathologies, but it is first a physiological phenomenon. Endothelial cell sensitivity to WSS is involved in several developmental and physiological vascular processes such as angiogenesis and vascular morphogenesis, vascular remodeling, and vascular tone. Local conditions of blood flow determine the characteristics of WSS, i.e., intensity, direction, pulsatility, sensed by the endothelial cells that, through their effect of the vascular network, impact WSS. All these processes generate a local-global retroactive loop that determines the ability of the vascular system to ensure the perfusion of the tissues. In order to account for the physiological role of WSS, the so-called shear stress set point theory has been proposed, according to which WSS sensing acts locally on vessel remodeling so that WSS is maintained close to a set point value, with local and distant effects of vascular blood flow. The aim of this article is (1) to review the existing literature on WSS sensing involvement on the behavior of endothelial cells and its short-term (vasoreactivity) and long-term (vascular morphogenesis and remodeling) effects on vascular functioning in physiological condition; (2) to present the various hypotheses about WSS sensors and analyze the conceptual background of these representations, in particular the concept of tensional prestress or biotensegrity; and (3) to analyze the relevance, explanatory value, and limitations of the WSS set point theory, that should be viewed as dynamical, and not algorithmic, processes, acting in a self-organized way. We conclude that this dynamic set point theory and the biotensegrity concept provide a relevant explanatory framework to analyze the physiological mechanisms of WSS sensing and their possible shift toward pathological situations.

Dataset Information

Non-Newtonian Endothelial Shear Stress Simulation: Does It Matter?

Publications

Non-Newtonian Endothelial Shear Stress Simulation: Does It Matter?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets