Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Ultrashort echo time imaging for quantification of hepatic iron overload: Comparison of acquisition and fitting methods via simulations, phantoms, and in vivo data.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Current R2*-MRI techniques for measuring hepatic iron content (HIC) use various acquisition types and fitting models.

Purpose

To evaluate the accuracy and precision of R2*-HIC acquisition and fitting methods.

Study type

Signal simulations, phantom study, and prospective in vivo cohort.

Population

In all, 132 patients (58/74 male/female, mean age 17.7 years).

Field strength/sequence

2D-multiecho gradient-echo (GRE) and ultrashort echo time (UTE) acquisitions at 1.5T.

Assessment

Synthetic MR signals were created to mimic published GRE and UTE methods, using different R2* values (25-2000 s-1 ) and signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). Phantoms with varying iron concentrations were scanned at 1.5T. In vivo data were analyzed from 132 patients acquired at 1.5T. R2* was estimated by fitting using three signal models. Accuracy and precision of R2* measurements for UTE acquisition parameters (SNR, echo spacing [ΔTE], maximum echo time [TEmax ]) and fitting methods were compared for simulated, phantom, and in vivo datasets.

Statistical tests

R2* accuracy was determined from the relative error and by linear regression analysis. Precision was evaluated using coefficient of variation (CoV) analysis.

Results

In simulations, all models had high R2* accuracy (error <5%) and precision (CoV <10%) for all SNRs, shorter ΔTE (≤0.5 msec), and longer TEmax (≥10.1 msec); except the constant offset model overestimated R2* at the lowest SNR. In phantoms and in vivo, all models produced similar R2* values for different SNRs and shorter ΔTEs (slopes: 0.99-1.06, R2 > 0.99, P < 0.001). In all experiments, R2* results degraded for high R2* values with longer ΔTE (≥1 msec). In vivo, shorter and longer TEmax gave similar R2* results (slopes: 1.02-1.06, R2 > 0.99, P < 0.001) for the noise subtraction model for 25≤R2*≤2000 s-1 . However, both quadratic and constant offset models, using shorter TEmax (≤4.7 msec) overestimated R2* and yielded high CoVs up to ∼170% for low R2* (<250 s-1 ).

Data conclusion

UTE with TEmax ≥ 10.1 msec and ΔTE ≤ 0.5 msec yields accurate R2* estimates over the entire clinical HIC range. Monoexponential fitting with noise subtraction is the most robust signal model to changes in UTE parameters and achieves the highest R2* accuracy and precision.

Level of evidence

2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:1475-1488.

SUBMITTER: Tipirneni-Sajja A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6768432 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Ultrashort echo time imaging for quantification of hepatic iron overload: Comparison of acquisition and fitting methods via simulations, phantoms, and in vivo data.

Tipirneni-Sajja Aaryani A   Loeffler Ralf B RB   Krafft Axel J AJ   Sajewski Andrea N AN   Ogg Robert J RJ   Hankins Jane S JS   Hillenbrand Claudia M CM  

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI 20181025 5


<h4>Background</h4>Current R2*-MRI techniques for measuring hepatic iron content (HIC) use various acquisition types and fitting models.<h4>Purpose</h4>To evaluate the accuracy and precision of R2*-HIC acquisition and fitting methods.<h4>Study type</h4>Signal simulations, phantom study, and prospective in vivo cohort.<h4>Population</h4>In all, 132 patients (58/74 male/female, mean age 17.7 years).<h4>Field strength/sequence</h4>2D-multiecho gradient-echo (GRE) and ultrashort echo time (UTE) acqu  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5511783 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5811338 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7375929 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8886621 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11519119 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6307944 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9929408 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7496783 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8147922 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8615072 | biostudies-literature